| |
An example, should an individual or corporation that is taxed at a 35% tax rate have passive income to take a deduction against, then should that individual make a $1 Million investment into a qualified production or film fund.
"The tax credit aspect is a comparison to other tradable State and Federal Tax Programs that are in demand by tax credit buyers and their representatives", Rutman states.
Rutman gives a primer on the differences and offers an innovative structured finance model that is applicable to film investments
The New Markets Tax Credit
The New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) Program permits taxpayers to receive a credit against Federal income taxes for making qualified equity investments in designated Community Development Entities (CDEs). Substantially all of the qualified equity investment must in turn be used by the CDE to provide investments in low-income communities. The credit provided to the investor totals 39 percent of the cost of the investment and is claimed over a seven-year credit allowance period. In each of the first three years, the investor receives a credit equal to five percent of the total amount paid for the stock or capital interest at the time of purchase. For the final four years, the value of the credit is six percent annually. Investors may not redeem their investments in CDEs prior to the conclusion of the seven-year period.
The Federal Historic Preservation Tax Credit Program
The 20% tax credit Preservation Tax Incentives reward private investment in rehabilitating historic properties such as offices, rental housing, and retail stores. Abandoned or under-used schools, warehouses, factories, churches, retail stores, apartments, hotels, houses, and offices in many cities have been restored to life in a manner that retains their historic character. The Preservation Tax Incentives have also helped to create moderate and low-income housing in historic buildings.
The Historic Preservation Tax Credit Program benefits the owner, the occupants, and the community by:
- Encouraging protection of landmarks through the promotion, recognition, and designation of historic structures
- Increasing the value of the rehabilitated property and returning underutilized structures to the tax rolls
- Upgrading downtowns and neighborhoods and often increasing the amount of available housing within the community.
American Jobs Creation Act Of 2004 100% Federal Deductions + 20-30% State Tax Credits!
In the United States, the 2004 enactment of Section 181 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code“) marked an unprecedented change in U.S. policy toward the phenomenon known as “Runaway
Production“.
Runaway Production refers to a film or television production that leaves one state or country to be filmed in another purely for economic reasons. This movement occurs because producers tend to film in the location where they can minimize production costs through tax incentives, cheaper labor.
Over the years, Canada has been the greatest beneficiary of U.S. runaway productions (according to some reports, Canada has claimed up to 80% of the U.S. runaways, generating an economic impact of $10.3 billion in production output in 1998 alone).
Section 181 represents the first time that the U.S. federal government has recognized this impact by passing tax legislation to actively combat the flight of film and television programming.
Section 181 permits a 100% write-off for the cost of certain audio-visual works, regardless of what media they are destined for (e.g., theatrical, television, DVD, etc.).
An individual or company who makes an investment into Section 181 qualified productions can take a 100% deduction of their investment against their passive income in the year their investment was
made.
The deduction can be made against active income should the investment be made by or through a widely held C corporation. The law is in effect until December 31, 2008, therefore investments must be made before that date and the money invested into qualifying productions must be spent by then by the productions.
An example, should an individual or corporation that is taxed at a 35% tax rate have passive income to take a deduction against, then should that individual make a $1 Million investment into a qualified production or film fund, the actual net investment will be $650,000 since they can take a deduction against that full $1 Million against their passive income, and 35% of $1M is $350,000, which is the value of the deduction they can make in the year they make their investment. Therefore, 1M minus $350,000 is $650,000 which is the net amount of their investment into the qualified production.
However, an investor or Company can also receive an additional 15-30% in state tax credits on the entire budget of a film BEFORE profits and other exit strategies that Noci Pictures Entertainment has in place.
This clearly shows a premium in tax credit and tax liability deduction compared with the other Federal Tax Credit Programs available.
Further, The Section 181 and State Programs benefit the tax credit investor, the producers, and the community by offering:
In the Short Term:
1. 100% passive income deductions under the IRS Section 181 "American Jobs Creation Act" for both individuals and corporate tax payers
2. 20%-30% in State Tax Credits (depending on state)
3. Economic Development
4. Job Creation, Including For Minorities And Women
5. Leverage of an additional 50-100 million in mezzanine/senior debt if needed to finance/co-finance 5-10 movies
In Medium-Long Term it would offer
1. hedge of revenues back to investors from 5-10 A -level films
2. Discount of future taxation from income under Section 199 for a Section 181 investment
3. Conversion Option in LLC to Common Stock for additional liquidity if I do a reverse merger in U.S or exit IPO on London AIM
SECTION 199
Section 199 is the income section; it is called the manufacturing section of The American Jobs Creation Act, 2004. Film Production has been defined as a manufacturer but television is not. Section 199 does not apply to television.
This section says that any manufacturer (Film Production) can have some tax relief on money returned to the investor.
o from 2005 till 2007 the taxpayer is entitled to a 3% deduction
o from 2007 to 2010 they get a 6% reduction
o And from 2010 on the get a 9 % reduction.
For example, if an investor get $1.00 back on a investment in a movie after he has already written off 100%, then he will only be taxed on .94 cents if I he is given it back between 2007 to 2010. From 2010 on then an investor gets to pay taxes only on .91 cents and it stays at this 9% rate.
Rutman adds "In the Short Term our structure would offer:
1. 100% passive income deductions under the IRS Section 181 "American Jobs Creation Act" for both individuals and corporate tax payers
2. 20%-30% in State Tax Credits (depending on state)
3. Economic Development
4. Job Creation, Including For Minorities And Women
5. Leverage of an additional 50-100 million in mezzanine/senior debt if needed to finance/co-finance 5-10 movies
In Medium-Long Term it would offer
1. Hedge of revenues back to investors from 5-10 A -level films
2. Discount of future taxation from income under Section 199 for a Section 181 investment
3. Conversion Option in LLC to Common Stock for additional liquidity if we do a reverse merger in U.S or exit IPO on London AIM"
"I cant think of too many other alternative investments that use this kind of leverage and exit structures", Rutman stated. "Our deal redefines 'Conscious Investing'"
|
yuri[.]noci.com 
